Decoupling footpaths from accidents
The Indian Supreme Court has ruled that footpaths serve a fundamental purpose beyond accident prevention, emphasizing the 'right to walk' as a reflection of civilizational advancement. The judgment argues that urban spaces should be equitable and not monopolized by motorized traffic.
Why it matters
This legal precedent could influence urban planning and infrastructure development in India by prioritizing pedestrian rights over vehicle movement.
A Bench of Justices P.S. Narasimha and Atul S. Chandurkar has, in its judgment (Maniyar Iliyaz@Shaik Riyaz versus P. Ayyappan), said a footpath’s relevance is more than that of a narrow strip of land where the ‘less-fortunate’ ones take cover from being knocked down by vehicles speeding on multi-lane motorways.
The article summarizes a judicial opinion, focusing on the legal reasoning and social implications.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in