Crypto Clarity Act still at mercy of ethics section as Democrats balk at Trump deal

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act faces a legislative impasse over which government entity should enforce ethics restrictions on federal officials. Democrats and Republicans are currently debating whether state attorneys general or the U.S. attorney general should hold this authority.
Why it matters
This legislation is critical for the future of crypto regulation in the U.S., and its passage is currently tied to broader political negotiations regarding government ethics.
The deepest current point of disagreement is who will enforce the ban, according to people familiar with a crypto industry briefing delivered Tuesday from a White House official. The industry insiders were told that the Democrats have held tight to their preference that state attorneys general be able to enforce the ethics restrictions on federal officials, while the White House and Republicans behind the bill are insisting on the U.S. attorney general as the top authority.
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act's advancement has come to depend on a compromise on this ethics restriction for government officials, which sources say would include the president, vice president and all members of Congress. If they can work out a compromise on that point, the rest of the bill is expected to move forward, despite a few loose ends in other areas, such as the treatment of developers in the bill's illicit-finance safeguards.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in