CPI(M) opposes introduction of Bill to give Vande Mataram legal protection, calls it unconstitutional
CPI(M) Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas has formally objected to the introduction of a bill that would grant legal protection to the national song 'Vande Mataram'. He argues that the bill is unconstitutional, conflicts with existing fundamental duties, and threatens freedom of speech and conscience.
Why it matters
The debate highlights the tension between nationalist legislative agendas and constitutional protections regarding freedom of expression and religious conscience in India.
Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas, leader of the CPI(M) group in the House, has given notice under Rule 67 objecting to introduction of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026.
The Bill seeks to extend statutory status and penal protection to the National Song, Vande Mataram, a status that the Constitution and Parliament have consciously withheld, Mr. Brittas said. He points to the Statement of Objects and Reasons, which cites Dr. Rajendra Prasad’s January 24, 1950 statement, and argues that it omits that the Constituent Assembly decided not to adopt a formal resolution on the matter. As a result, he said, the statement never carried constitutional force.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in