Article may be outdated

This article is 17 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

The Verge·3 min read·medium

Coyote vs. Acme is even funnier because Warner Bros. Discovery tried to kill it

C
Charles Pulliam-Moore
Coyote vs. Acme is even funnier because Warner Bros. Discovery tried to kill it
AI Summary

The film 'Coyote vs. Acme' has gained significant attention due to Warner Bros. Discovery's initial attempt to shelve the project for tax write-offs. Despite the corporate controversy, the film has received positive reviews for its humor and creative blend of live-action and animation.

Why it matters

It highlights the growing tension between corporate financial strategies and the preservation of creative works in the entertainment industry.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

There’s an argument to be made that people wouldn’t be all that interested in Coyote vs. Acme if it weren’t for the way David Zaslav tried to kill it. By trying to shelve the project, Warner Bros. Discovery only drew attention to its habit of disappearing nearly completed movies in order to cash in on tax write-offs.

Coyote vs. Acme’s generally positive reviews are on the money; it really is one of the best Looney Tunes movies in years. In theory, this suggests that the movie might do well at the box office and become a case study in WBD making terrible decisions. Ironically, though, all of the drama surrounding the live-action / animated hybrid film is actually part of what makes it an enjoyable watch.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
entertainmentbusinessculture

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in