Article may be outdated

This article is 64 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

TimesLIVE·3 min read·medium

Court rejects R2.8m RAF claim from man for work dismissal

E
Ernest Mabuza
Court rejects R2.8m RAF claim from man for work dismissal
✦AI Summary

The North West High Court dismissed a R2.8m claim against the Road Accident Fund after finding inconsistencies in the claimant's evidence regarding his job dismissal. The court noted a contradiction between the employer's dismissal letter and the claimant's own report to an industrial psychologist.

Why it matters

This case underscores the importance of evidentiary consistency in legal claims against public funds.

✦Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

The North West High Court has dismissed a claim for nearly R2.9m for past and future loss of earnings against the Road Accident Fund (RAF), ruling that the claimant failed to prove his dismissal from work was caused by injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision.

Oaitse Comfort Letsholonyane was injured in a head-on collision on the N4 between Lobatse and Zeerust on June 26 2022. He suffered an open fracture to his right elbow and underwent surgery involving the insertion of a metal plate and screws.

At the time of the accident, Letsholonyane was employed as a vehicle examiner at Dekra Automotive, earning about R11,924 per month.

After a three-month recuperation period, Letsholonyane returned to work. However, his employment was subsequently terminated on October 12 2023.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
businesspolitics
✦

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in