Conservative super-lawyer squares up for his latest Supreme Court argument
Conservative lawyer Paul Clement is preparing for his 129th Supreme Court argument, maintaining his status as one of the most prolific advocates in the country. The article explores his legal philosophy, including his support for the unitary executive theory and his history of challenging federal agency power.
Why it matters
Clement's influence on Supreme Court jurisprudence has been instrumental in shaping conservative legal victories regarding gun rights and administrative state limitations.
It's arguable whether Paul Clement is the best Supreme Court advocate of his generation. But there's no doubt he's the most prolific.
When he approaches the lectern at the Supreme Court Wednesday, it will mark his 129th time arguing before the justices.
He defined the job this way at a recent conference sponsored by the conservative National Review magazine: "I always think a good working definition of a good Supreme Court advocate is somebody who's trying to get to five for their client," Clement said.
Five of nine justices — in other words, victory.
The Republican super-lawyer has racked up dozens of those wins since his days as solicitor general in the George W. Bush era.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in