Concise bidding
This article recounts a bridge tournament anecdote involving a misunderstanding over a bidding sequence. The director ruled that a seven-club contract stood, which the declarer successfully fulfilled through skillful play.
Why it matters
It serves as a lighthearted human-interest piece regarding the complexities and social dynamics of competitive bridge.
Today’s deal comes from the mind of South Florida’s Richard Pavlicek, a great American player, teacher, and writer. It was played, according to Pavlicek, at a tournament in the North Pole. The players were all local residents, but from two different factions that did not always get along and did not speak the same language. South intended to bid two clubs, Stayman, but the opponents thought he bid seven clubs. The director was called and he ruled that seven clubs was the final contract. The fact that he was from the same faction as East-West had nothing to do with his ruling.
The content is a non-political, anecdotal sports/leisure story with no ideological framing.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in