Colorado farmer rejected solar leases on 2,700 acres to protect family farm
A Colorado farmer, Marc Arnusch, chose to preserve his family farm by rejecting lucrative solar lease offers and instead establishing a conservation easement. He is now facing an IRS audit regarding the tax deductions associated with the land preservation agreement.
Why it matters
The case illustrates the tension between renewable energy land use and agricultural preservation, as well as the complexities of federal tax law regarding conservation easements.
Colorado farmer Marc Arnusch had a straightforward choice: accept millions of dollars from solar companies seeking to lease 2,700 acres of his family’s farmland, or keep the property in agriculture for the next generation. He chose the farm. Now, after spending nearly $1 million documenting a conservation easement, he is facing an IRS audit over the tax deduction associated with it. Reporting by Just the News, recent statements from the Internal Revenue Service and reporting by Colorado Public Radio help illuminate the dispute and the broader debate over conservation easements. Arnusch, a third-generation farmer in Weld County, said the solar offers were tempting but ultimately incompatible with what he wanted for the land.Instead, his family pursued a conservation easement, a legal agreement that permanently limits certain uses of privately owned land in order to protect its conservation values.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in