Article may be outdated

This article is 10 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

The Guardian Environment·3 min read·medium

Climate damage would obliterate any economic benefits of new North Sea fields, analysis shows

D
Damian Carrington Environment editor
Climate damage would obliterate any economic benefits of new North Sea fields, analysis shows
AI Summary

A new analysis suggests that the economic damage caused by carbon emissions from proposed North Sea oil and gas fields would significantly outweigh any potential financial benefits to the UK. The report argues that the projects are economically and environmentally unjustifiable.

Why it matters

The findings fuel the ongoing political debate in the UK regarding the balance between energy security and climate commitments.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

The argument that approving Rosebank and Jackdaw would cut bills and improve energy security is a ‘delusion’, say experts. The argument that approving Rosebank and Jackdaw would cut bills and improve energy security is a ‘delusion’, say experts. Fossil fuels Climate damage would obliterate any economic benefits of new North Sea fields, analysis shows Exclusive: Economic harm of CO2 pollution from Rosebank and Jackdaw forecast to far outweigh any boost to UK

Prefer the Guardian on Google The climate damage caused by developing the Rosebank and Jackdaw oil and gas fields under consideration by the UK government would destroy their economic benefits many times over, according to an analysis.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
environmenteconomypolitics

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in