Clearance in reverse: On top court, post facto clearances

The Supreme Court of India recently ruled on post facto environmental clearances, quashing a 2021 memorandum while allowing the government to potentially legalize violations through new notifications. The article critiques this as a procedural loophole that undermines environmental protection laws.
Why it matters
It highlights the tension between economic development projects and the integrity of environmental impact assessment regulations.
India’s environmental impact assessment (EIA) regime rests on a single sequencing rule: a project must be appraised before the pickaxe pierces the ground, not after the building is operational. The Supreme Court of India’s July 29 order , from a Bench led by the Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant, on post facto clearances, reaffirms that rule even as it hollows it out. By quashing the 2021 Office Memorandum while leaving the door open for the Centre to legalise violations through a statutory notification, the Court’s distinction between an administrative order and a notification, is effectively a fig-leaf — a procedural nicety dressed up as respect for environmental norms. The deeper problem that the judgment does not confront is the dissonance between the State-level appraisal machinery and the Centre’s law.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in