Clarity's failure could speed crypto innovation while shielding incumbents
Regulatory agencies like the SEC and CFTC are moving to fill gaps in crypto oversight following the failure of the Clarity legislation. Experts suggest that while this creates uncertainty, it may also accelerate commercial opportunities for firms willing to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape.
Why it matters
The lack of comprehensive federal crypto legislation forces companies to adapt to agency-led rulemaking, which significantly impacts market innovation and compliance strategies.
Interviews with senior executives and legal experts suggest broad agreement that regulation will keep moving. Their expectations diverge over whether agency action can become a durable foundation or leave businesses adapting to rules vulnerable to political and legal change.
Lev Breydo, an assistant professor of law at William & Mary Law School, said Clarity exposed divisions within the industry, from ethics provisions to the yield fight with community banks.
“A coalition that looked unified against Gensler found out definitions create winners and losers,” he said.
Despite the setback, agencies are moving quickly to fill the regulatory gap.
The SEC’s five-year “ Innovation Exemption ” introduced September 17 lets qualifying venues trade tokenized U.S. stocks through blockchain liquidity pools while it works on permanent rules.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in