Clancy holdout juror mimicked strangling during deliberations, juror claims
A juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial claims a holdout juror mimicked strangling during deliberations and failed to provide evidence for his conviction stance, leading to a mistrial. Clancy is accused of the 2023 murders of her three young children in Massachusetts.
Why it matters
This report raises serious questions about juror conduct and the integrity of the deliberation process in a high-profile murder trial, impacting the pursuit of justice for a tragic crime.
A juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new details about what he said happened inside the jury room that led to a mistrial in the case of the Massachusetts woman facing first-degree murder charges for the 2023 deaths of her three young children.
Nick Dargie, one of the three men on the 12-person jury, told ABC News' Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict did not show any evidence explaining his vote.
"There was several times I would ask him to show us evidence or, you know, describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and ... he couldn't," Dargie, 25, said in an interview that aired Thursday on " Good Morning America ."
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in