CJP protest: SC clarifies States can withdraw FIRs against students in accordance with law
The Supreme Court of India has clarified that states are permitted to withdraw FIRs against student protesters involved in NEET-related demonstrations, provided they are not accused of serious crimes. The court suggested a classification process to identify cases eligible for closure under statutory procedures.
Why it matters
This ruling balances the right to protest with legal accountability, offering a pathway for amnesty for students involved in non-violent demonstrations.
The Supreme Court on Monday (August 3, 2026) clarified that its July 28 order would not prevent the NCT of Delhi or any other State from closing or withdrawing proceedings arising out of FIRs registered against student protesters, wherever permissible in accordance with law.
The clarification came after the Centre submitted that it was “serious” about its assurance that amnesty would be granted to students who had participated in demonstrations over the NEET examination paper leak, including the July 20 Parliament march in Delhi and subsequent protests in several States.
A Bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant also clarified the scope of its earlier direction restraining the police from taking coercive action against protesting students unless they had criminal antecedents. The Bench said the protection would not extend to persons accused of serious offences, including rape and other heinous crimes.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in