Chinese authors far less likely to be published in top journals
A study published in Science journals indicates that researchers based in China face significantly lower acceptance rates compared to their Western counterparts. The authors suggest that high volumes of submissions from China may lead editors to filter out papers during initial screenings.
Why it matters
The findings raise concerns about systemic bias in academic publishing and the challenges faced by global researchers in high-impact journals.
Researchers based in China face persistent and substantial disadvantage in getting their work published in the world’s most influential science journals, according to an extensive new study of editorial decision-making.
The article presents the study's findings and includes the authors' own explanation for the data, maintaining a balanced perspective.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in