Charlie Kirk and the indignity of digital immortality
This opinion piece explores the concept of digital immortality through the lens of the late far-right provocateur Charlie Kirk. It argues that the internet's tendency to endlessly recycle and caricature the deceased creates a form of posthumous humiliation that lacks the finality of traditional death.
Why it matters
It raises philosophical questions about the impact of digital culture and AI on the legacy and dignity of public figures after their death.
The 20th century has devised an impressive repertoire for humiliating its notorious dead. Benito Mussolini was captured fleeing Italy in disguise, shot by partisans, dragged to Milan and hung upside down from a petrol station in Piazzale Loreto, where his corpse became public entertainment. Muammar Qadhafi was hauled from a drainage pipe, beaten and killed, then deposited in a commercial freezer so Libyans could queue up for a look at their fallen dictator. Nicolae Ceaușescu and his wife Elena were captured during Romania’s 1989 revolution, subjected to a perfunctory Christmas Day show trial and executed by firing squad, their deaths subsequently broadcast to the country. Even Adolf Hitler, unwilling to surrender himself to the Red Army, died by suicide in his bunker and had his body doused in petrol and burned in a bomb crater, lest even his remains become a Soviet souvenir.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in