Case for consensus: On delimitation

The editorial criticizes the Indian government for bypassing parliamentary deliberation on significant issues like delimitation and FCRA amendments. It argues that a healthy democracy requires consensus-building rather than just relying on a parliamentary majority.
Why it matters
It highlights concerns regarding the erosion of democratic processes and transparency in Indian governance.
The monsoon session of Parliament is in its last week without any substantive deliberations or legislative outcomes. There may be several reasons for the stalemate, but at its core are the controversial FCRA amendments and the opacity around the government’s delimitation proposals. Overall, it is as if the government views Parliament as an obstacle to be circumvented rather than a forum for deliberation and consensus-building on national issues. That is the attitude that offers no resolution to any question, while it may create winners and losers on some. But in the absence of good-faith conversations and consensus, what may appear to be a victory for the government or the Opposition at one moment could turn out to be a net loss for parliamentary democracy and the nation. A parliamentary majority is a necessary technicality, but democracy is not limited to that.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in