Article may be outdated

This article is 52 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

Times of India·3 min read·medium

Can landlords charge tenants for repainting walls? What Delhi High Court said

T
TOI REAL ESTATE DESK
Can landlords charge tenants for repainting walls? What Delhi High Court said
AI Summary

The Delhi High Court ruled that landlords cannot charge tenants for routine maintenance like painting and whitewashing, classifying these as normal wear and tear. However, tenants remain liable for damages that exceed ordinary usage, such as the removal of fixtures.

Why it matters

This judgment provides legal clarity for rental disputes in India, protecting tenants from arbitrary security deposit deductions while upholding landlord rights regarding property damage.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

Can your landlord deduct money from your security deposit or ask you to pay for repainting walls or fixing minor damage? Not always.While tenants may be liable for damage that goes beyond ordinary wear and tear, landlords cannot make arbitrary deductions without proving that the tenant actually caused the damage and that the costs claimed are justified.This question came under the spotlight in a recent Delhi High Court judgment in the M/S Ritas Heritage & Ors vs Sangita Gupta & Anr case, which clarified when landlords are legally entitled to recover repair and renovation costs from outgoing tenants.In this case, the landlords claimed they had spent nearly Rs 7 lakh on repairs and renovation after the tenants vacated the property, of which Rs 4.5 lakh was attributed to the second and third floors that formed the rented premises. To support their claim, they produced invoices, bills, receipts and photographs showing the property's condition after it was vacated.The court, however, did not accept this claim in its entirety. It drew a clear distinction: expenses arising from normal wear and tear, including routine whitewashing and painting, are the landlord's responsibility, not the tenant's.It said, "expenses attributable to normal wear and tear of the tenanted premises, including routine items such as whitewashing and painting, are ordinarily to be borne by the landlord and cannot be fastened upon the tenant."At the same time, the Court did not dismiss the landlords' claim altogether. It examined the photographic evidence and found indications of removal of electrical fittings and damage that went beyond what could reasonably be called normal wear and tear. Such damage, distinct from routine deterioration, could legitimately be attributed to the tenant.The Court also took note that the building had four floors in total, while the disputed claim of Rs. 7,00,000 pertained to the entire structure, an important factor in determining how much could fairly be apportioned to the suit property alone. So, if you're moving out of a rented home, remember that your landlord cannot automatically deduct money for repainting or routine maintenance.However, if you've caused damage beyond ordinary use, you could be asked to pay for the repairs. The key takeaway from the Delhi High Court's ruling is that the distinction between "wear and tear" and "actual damage" ultimately determines who bears the bill.Ready to Make a Smarter Property Decision? Build Your Legacy with TOI Homes.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
businessculture
Political Bias
Center
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 90%

The article reports on a legal judgment neutrally, presenting both the court's protection of tenants and its acknowledgment of landlord claims.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in