Blue Planet III is keeping the rough edges in the age of AI
The producers of the BBC's Blue Planet III are intentionally including imperfect footage to maintain authenticity in an era of AI-generated content. By keeping elements like debris or poor water conditions, the series aims to distinguish real nature photography from synthetic imagery.
Why it matters
This approach reflects a growing cultural trend of prioritizing 'human' or 'organic' authenticity as AI tools make it increasingly difficult to distinguish between reality and fabrication.
BBC’s Blue Planet III is looking to prove its authenticity by leaving in the less-than-perfect shots. Previous incarnations of the nature series were defined by their gorgeous, crystal-clear footage that seemed almost too good to be real. But one dead giveaway of AI is when things look too polished and seamless. To counter that, Blue Planet III goes warts and all.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in