Billionaires fleeing California's wealth tax could cost the state more than the levy makes, Stanford economists say
Stanford economists suggest that California's proposed wealth tax on billionaires may generate significantly less revenue than projected. They warn that the potential flight of high-net-worth individuals could lead to a net loss in long-term state income tax revenue.
Why it matters
This analysis highlights the economic debate surrounding wealth taxation and the mobility of the ultra-wealthy in response to fiscal policy.
A Stanford paper warns that California could lose more in future income taxes than it would raise from a one-time billionaire tax. Stephen Lam/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images Several billionaires have left or plan to leave California over its proposed wealth tax. The departures could mean that the state loses more in the long term than the one-time tax brings in. That's according to a working paper shared by a pair of Stanford economists. Supporters of California’s proposed billionaire tax say it could raise about $100 billion. But a new paper puts the takings closer to $30 billion and warns that the state could ultimately lose money if its richest residents flee. Proposition 40, which goes before voters on November 3, would impose a one-time 5% tax on billionaires who were California residents on January 1, 2026, with their wealth valued at the end of the year.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in