Bhartrhari's Paradox
This piece explores the philosophical paradox of 'unnameability' as discussed by the fifth-century Indian grammarian Bhartrhari. It notes that any attempt to define or argue for the existence of unnameable things inherently requires naming them, creating a logical contradiction.
Why it matters
It serves as a reflection on the limits of language and logic, relevant to linguistics and philosophy.
There are some things that are unnameable. But it seems impossible to verify this by giving positive instances, because this would require us to name that which we have declared to be unnameable.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in