Bengaluru’s risk-averse force
The Bengaluru City Police are facing criticism for their 'risk-averse' approach to policing, which includes filing suo motu FIRs against protesters and restricting demonstrations to Freedom Park. Critics argue these actions suppress dissent and violate democratic norms regardless of which political party is in power.
Why it matters
The situation raises concerns about the shrinking space for civil society and the weaponization of administrative orders to manage political expression in urban India.
T he Bengaluru City Police recently registered a suo motu FIR against a woman for holding a placard which read “Umar Khalid Zindabad”, “Sharjeel Imam Zindabad” at a students’ protest. Neha Bora, National President of the All India Students’ Association, during her visit to Bengaluru last week, slammed the Congress government in Karnataka for its action and said that parties who claim to be against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) must lead by example rather than pay lip service.
The article focuses on the suppression of dissent and highlights criticism of police actions, framing the issue through the lens of civil liberties.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in