Ban on neo-Nazi White Australia party is ‘authoritarian’ and breaches constitution, high court hears
The neo-Nazi White Australia party is challenging a government ban in the High Court, arguing that the legislation is authoritarian and unconstitutional. Lawyers for the group claim the government lacks the power to outlaw political parties, citing historical precedents.
Why it matters
This case tests the limits of government power in banning extremist political organizations and the balance between national security and freedom of political communication.
Members of the White Australia party, including its leader, Thomas Sewell, sat in the front of the courtroom’s public benches. Members of the White Australia party, including its leader, Thomas Sewell, sat in the front of the courtroom’s public benches. Australia news Ban on neo-Nazi White Australia party is ‘authoritarian’ and breaches constitution, high court hears Lawyers also argue commonwealth does not have the power to ban a political party, as the high court ruled in 1951 over attempt to ban the Communist party
Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates
Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast
Prefer the Guardian on Google Lawyers for an outlawed neo-Nazi political party have argued anti-hate laws passed after the Bondi terror attack rely on the opinion of a politician and are “authoritarian in nature”.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in