Association flags lack of transparency in selection process of DME

The Service Doctors and Post Graduates Association has criticized the Health department for a lack of transparency in the selection process for the Director of Medical Education. The association argues that interviews were conducted without a published promotion panel, violating established administrative practices.
Why it matters
It highlights concerns regarding administrative accountability and fair promotion practices within public health institutions.
The Service Doctors and Post Graduates Association (SDPGA) has raised objections to the Health department’s decision to interview 10 government medical college deans for the post of Director of Medical Education (DME), arguing that the process lacked transparency as no formal promotion panel was published.
The association urged the State government to scrap the interview process and appoint the eligible senior doctor based on the promotion panel prepared as per the established practice of assessing eligible doctors with March 15 as the cut-off date every year.
The department had introduced a system of appointing persons to senior positions such as DME, Director of Medical and Rural Health Services (DMS), deans and joint directors through interviews. Usually, a promotion panel of eligible senior doctors as of March 15 every year is prepared, based on which promotions are granted.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in