Artists are lawyering up against AI slop, and some are even winning

Authors and artists are increasingly filing lawsuits against AI companies, alleging that their copyrighted works were used to train AI models without permission. These legal battles highlight the tension between the rapid development of generative AI and the intellectual property rights of human creators.
Why it matters
The outcome of these cases will likely set legal precedents for the future of AI training data and the protection of creative labor.
When The Atlantic published a searchable dataset of works used to train AI, Kirk Wallace Johnson, like a lot of artists, looked for his name out of curiosity. And, like a lot of artists, he found it. Essentially, his books, like The Feather Thief and The Fishermen and the Dragon — nonfiction tomes that he spent “five to six years researching, writing, and investigating” — had been pirated and fed to a chatbot. He says he felt a “cocktail” of emotions: “anger over the brazenness of the theft, worry over what this means for writers, and a healthy thirst for revenge on these massive corporations that have become galactically wealthy” using his intellectual property.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in