Are legal guarantees insufficient in abolishing untouchability?

Experts Valerian Rodrigues and Disha Wadekar discuss whether legal frameworks are sufficient to eradicate the practice of untouchability in India. They argue that while laws are necessary, they often fail to address the deep-seated social conscience and historical caste structures.
Why it matters
The discussion highlights the limitations of the legal system in addressing systemic social discrimination and caste-based crimes.
In August this year, the performance of a “purification” ritual by certain Hindu groups in Uttarakhand , at the location where Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, who belongs to a Dalit community, addressed a public rally , led to a national conversation on the practice of untouchability. This discourse was shaped as Opposition Congress leaders accused the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) dispensation of practising caste discrimination . The Uttarakhand BJP chief defended the ritual, saying that it was meant to “cleanse” the area of the ideas that Mr. Kharge was espousing at the rally. After a sustained campaign from Opposition leaders and civil society actors, an FIR was registered in the matter . So, are legal guarantees insufficient in abolishing untouchability? Valerian Rodrigues and Disha Wadekar discuss the question in a conversation moderated by Abhinay Lakshman . Edited excerpts:
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in