Andrew Huberman, full-body MRIs and the controversy, backlash
A debate has emerged regarding the medical necessity and efficacy of full-body MRI scans for asymptomatic individuals. While some proponents argue they catch life-saving issues early, many medical professionals warn of high costs and the risks of false positives leading to unnecessary procedures.
Why it matters
The rise of elective, direct-to-consumer medical imaging raises ethical and economic questions about the standard of care and the potential for over-diagnosis.
Hear this story You eat healthy, work out and feel great. Then, the intrusive thought: What if a mysterious disease is lurking somewhere in your body? Wouldn't you want to know?
You visit a futuristic, fresh-smelling wellness clinic and shimmy into a hospital gown. You lie down on the table, and a machine scans your body for any hidden problems. It spits out a shocking answer : You have a brain tumor, and thank goodness we caught it, because you were going to die and now we can take it out and save your life.
This experience is what many full-body MRI proponents tout as a success story. If you book one of these scans, you could save yourself a world of hurt later. Andrew Huberman , a neuroscientist, professor and influential podcaster said as much on Aug. 1.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in