Article may be outdated

This article is 58 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

Ars Technica·3 min read·medium

An AI-supervised remote exam went so badly that 58,000 students must retake it

Nate Anderson
An AI-supervised remote exam went so badly that 58,000 students must retake it
✦AI Summary

Mexico's UNAM university has ordered 58,000 students to retake an entrance exam after AI-powered proctoring software failed to prevent widespread cheating. The decision follows an investigation that revealed a suspicious surge in top-tier scores compared to previous years.

Why it matters

This incident highlights the significant risks and reliability issues associated with relying on AI-supervised remote testing for high-stakes academic admissions.

✦Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

retake! An AI-supervised remote exam went so badly that 58,000 students must retake it Top scores increased by 5x.

71 Credit: Getty Images Credit: Getty Images Text settings Story text Size Small Standard Large Width * Standard Wide Links Standard Orange * Subscribers only Learn more Minimize to nav Earlier this summer, nearly 160,000 applicants took the entrance exam for UNAM, Mexico’s largest university. For the first time, they did it completely remotely, using a “lockdown” browser and AI-powered webcam proctoring software, over several weeks from late May through early June.

When exam results came in, they bore little resemblance to past results, especially at the top. Between 2021 and 2025, 3.5 percent of test takers scored 100 or more on the 120-question UNAM test. This year, 16.3 percent did so.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
educationaitechnology
✦

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in