All animals need equal consideration
The article examines the Indian Supreme Court's inconsistent approach to animal welfare, contrasting a recent ruling on elephant custody with a stricter policy regarding street dogs. It questions whether the judiciary is the appropriate institution to resolve complex moral and legal issues concerning animal rights.
Why it matters
It highlights a critical debate regarding judicial consistency and the legal status of animals in India's justice system.
O n June 9, a Supreme Court division Bench observed that the court cannot remain a mute spectator in matters concerning animals, noting that their wellbeing is of paramount importance. The court’s observation in this case ( Jayakrishna Menon vs. Krishnankutty & Ors ) arose from an ownership dispute over Raman, Keralam’s tallest elephant, who was being used for temple activities. Raman’s temporary custodian was responsible for care and upkeep but the elephant continued to be used for temple activities despite it being prohibited by the top court. The Supreme Court ordered the Keralam government to take custody of Raman , emphasising that it would fail in its duty towards “voiceless animals” if it turned a blind eye to such defiance of court orders.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in