Ajeet Bharti Invoked 'Upper' And 'Lower' Caste Hierarchy In Marriage Alliance, Prima Facie Shows 'Intent To Humiliate': Delhi Court

A Delhi Court denied anticipatory bail to YouTuber Ajeet Bharti, citing prima facie evidence of caste-based humiliation in his remarks about an MP. The court noted that his comments regarding caste hierarchy and marriageability violated the SC/ST Act.
Why it matters
The ruling underscores the legal consequences of using caste-based slurs and discriminatory rhetoric in public discourse in India.
While denying anticipatory bail to YouTuber and social media commentator Ajeet Bharti, a Delhi Court has observed that his remarks concerning the caste and marriageability of a sitting Member of Parliament prima facie disclosed an offence under Section 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.Additional Sessions Judge Saurabh Pratap Singh Laler of Patiala House Courts made the observation while rejecting the anticipatory bail application filed by Bharti in a SC/ST Act case.The case arose from an episode of Bharti's self-titled programme, uploaded on his verified social media account and YouTube on August 22, which allegedly contained casteist, derogatory and humiliating remarks concerning members of the Scheduled Caste community, Chandra Shekhar Azad (a sitting MP from Nagina) and Dr BR Ambedkar.The specific remarks were made in response to a social-media comment concerning Bharti's sister's alleged marriage to the MP.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in