AI doomsday debate: What are AI researchers and critics afraid of?
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced the company's IPO delay to 2026, citing AI safety concerns, including a 10% chance of human extinction by decade's end. This follows an ex-Anthropic researcher's warning about uncontrolled AI, sparking a debate between those advocating for slower AI development and those accusing critics of hyperbole.
Why it matters
The article highlights a critical ongoing debate among AI experts and the public about the existential risks and immediate harms of advanced AI, influencing policy, research direction, and public perception of the technology.
The story so far: OpenAI’s Chief Executive Sam Altman announced on September 13 that the company’s highly anticipated IPO will not happen in 2026 . He cited safety concerns over artificial intelligence, remarking that even a 10% chance of AI ‘causing human extinction’ by the decade’s end is “unacceptable”.
The announcement comes after an ex-Anthropic researcher quit last week over fears that AI companies are racing to build systems they won’t be able to control. “The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade,” he posted on X. On one hand, several AI researchers shared his warning and supported his call to slow AI model development. On the other hand, people accused him of hyperbolising AI’s impact without evidence, and even indirectly painting AI companies as more powerful than they are.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in