AGC right to seek clarification on Najib’s house arrest order, say lawyers
The Attorney-General’s Chambers in Malaysia is seeking legal clarification regarding the 'discharge' order for former prime minister Najib Razak's house arrest. Legal experts suggest the AG's move is a prudent step to resolve ambiguity in the court's terminology.
Why it matters
This case highlights significant procedural questions regarding the implementation of high-profile judicial orders and the authority of the Pardons Board.
The Attorney-General’s Chambers has called for former prime minister Najib Razak’s house arrest to be deferred until a review of 'complex legal questions' over the discharge order issued by the High Court in Kuala Lumpur.
PETALING JAYA: The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) was right to question the wording of the Kuala Lumpur High Court’s discharge order involving former prime minister Najib Razak, say several lawyers and a legal expert.
Lawyer Razlan Hadri Zulkifli said there had been considerable confusion and differing interpretations among the public over the use of the word “discharge” in the court order.
He said Attorney-General Dusuki Mokhtar was not challenging the Federal Territories Pardons Board’s decision but merely seeking clarification on the proper interpretation of the order.
Also covering this story
One other newsroom covered this event. We read that version too.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in