Academic bats for AI as aid, not substitute, in judiciary
A law professor at an international conference in Brussels argued that while AI can enhance judicial efficiency, it should serve only as a support tool rather than a replacement for human judges. The discussion emphasized the need to integrate ethics and constitutional values into legal education.
Why it matters
As AI integration in legal systems grows, defining the boundaries of machine involvement in judicial decision-making is a critical ethical and legal challenge.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) should be used to strengthen judicial administration, but judicial decision-making must remain with human judges, a senior law professor said while addressing an international conference in Brussels on the role of AI and Machine Learning in judicial functioning.
The article reports on an academic perspective regarding technology policy without injecting bias.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in