The Hindu·3 min read·medium

A tale of two medicines: why India should replace ‘general medicine’ with ‘internal medicine’

A
Abraham Ittyachen M.
A tale of two medicines: why India should replace ‘general medicine’ with ‘internal medicine’
AI Summary

The article argues that India should rename its 'General Medicine' specialty to 'Internal Medicine' to align with international standards. It suggests that the current name is ambiguous and fails to reflect the specialized, complex nature of the work performed by internists.

Why it matters

Standardizing medical terminology could improve professional clarity and patient understanding within the global medical community.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

Walk into any major teaching hospital in India and look at the signboards. You are likely to find Cardiology, Neurology, Nephrology, Gastroenterology, Endocrinology departments—and, somewhere among them, a General Medicine. Now travel outside India and ask for the corresponding specialty. In most countries and in much of international medical literature, you will be directed to Internal Medicine. Are these two different specialties? No.

The Indian ‘general medicine’ physician and the international ‘internal medicine’ physician belong, essentially, to the same broad specialty: the discipline concerned principally with the diagnosis and non-surgical management of disease in adults. The question, therefore, is not whether Indian general medicine is different from internal medicine; it is whether India should continue using a name that has become increasingly ambiguous when a more precise and internationally intelligible name is available.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
healtheducation

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in