4-hour battery storage is cheaper to install than gas turbines all across globe

A Wood Mackenzie report indicates that four-hour battery storage is now more cost-effective than gas turbines in all 43 markets analyzed. Falling costs for solar and battery technology are rapidly displacing traditional gas-peaking power plants globally.
Why it matters
This shift marks a significant milestone in the energy transition, suggesting that renewable storage is becoming the most economically viable option for grid stability.
Wood Mackenzie’s latest global report on levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) shows that advancing technologies and market dynamics continue to drive divergent prices, with four-hour battery storage now less expensive than open-cycle gas turbines in all 43 markets where both technologies were modeled.
In the Middle East and Africa, where utility-scale solar already leads at $37/MWh, four-hour storage is forecast to fall a further 33% to $80/MWh by 2035, displacing gas peaking on cost across every gas market in the region. China remains the global storage cost benchmark at more than 55% below the rest of Asia Pacific average, illustrating how manufacturing scale is redrawing the global cost map.
“This economic shift is decisive and widening,” said Ahmed Jameel Abdullah, principal analyst at Wood Mackenzie. “Gas turbine shortages and rising fuel volatility are driving up peaking costs, while expanding battery manufacturing continues to push storage costs down.”
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in