25 Years of Mass Surveillance Is Enough
This essay argues that mass surveillance, initially justified as a post-9/11 national security measure, has expanded into a routine tool for law enforcement and private corporations. It highlights the symbiotic relationship between government agencies and private data brokers in tracking citizens.
Why it matters
The erosion of privacy through the intersection of corporate data collection and government surveillance poses significant challenges to civil liberties and democratic norms.
This essay was written with Cindy Cohn, and originally appeared in Lawfare .
One of the many legacies of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 is the government-wide shift from targeted surveillance—such as individual wiretaps or pen register/trap and trace orders—to mass surveillance techniques—such as tapping into the internet backbone or mass collection of telephone or internet metadata. The legal and technical architecture of modern mass surveillance, initially framed as a necessary defense against terrorist threats, has grown far beyond that justification and national security in general. Mass surveillance is now a routine tool used by law enforcement. ICE uses it in immigration actions and against people exercising their First Amendment rights to protest. It’s also increasingly part of private security systems, such as facial recognition at venues such as Madison Square Garden and networked Flock license plate capture systems on roads and in parking lots.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in