25 Years of Mass Surveillance Is Enough [Auth: Cindy Cohn; Bruce Schneier]
![25 Years of Mass Surveillance Is Enough [Auth: Cindy Cohn; Bruce Schneier]](/api/imagekit?u=https%3A%2F%2Flawfare-assets-new.azureedge.net%2Fassets%2Fimages%2Fdefault-source%2Farticle-images%2Fsurveillance-camera-(1).png%3Fsfvrsn%3D1f2a75b9_7&w=3840&q=75)
The authors argue that mass surveillance, initially justified by post-9/11 security needs, has expanded into a pervasive tool for law enforcement and private corporations. They highlight the dangerous pipeline between private data brokers and government agencies.
Why it matters
It raises significant concerns about the erosion of privacy rights and the normalization of surveillance capitalism in modern society.
One of the many legacies of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 is the government-wide shift from targeted surveillance - such as individual wiretaps or pen register/trap and trace orders - to mass surveillance techniques - such as tapping into the internet backbone or mass collection of telephone or internet metadata. The legal and technical architecture of modern mass surveillance, initially framed as a necessary defense against terrorist threats, has grown far beyond that justification and national security in general. Mass surveillance is now a routine tool used by law enforcement. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) uses it in immigration actions and against people exercising their First Amendment rights to protest. It's also increasingly part of private security systems, such as facial recognition at venues such as Madison Square Garden and networked Flock license plate capture systems on roads and in parking lots.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in